🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration illustrates how little it can be influential if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an time that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.